UK MPs suggest human rights conditions imposed in UK-India trade deals | India News

World

LONDON: Several British MPs have known as for human rights provisions to be included in any future trade deal with India, after debating in the House of Commons the persecution being skilled by minorities.
MPs from numerous events — together with the Conservatives — took half in the backbench debate on Tuesday on the persecution of Muslims, Christians and different minority teams in India.
Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) MP Jim Shannon known as on the UK authorities “to ensure that robust human rights provisions are included in any future trade and investment agreement.”
“Violations of freedom of religious belief lead to domestic conflict, which is good neither for India’s economic prosperity, nor for the chances of a stable, long-term trading relationship between India and the UK,” he stated.
The matters mentioned included stigmatization of Muslims as “bio-terrorists” and “corona-jihadists” following an occasion in Delhi on the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic, the unfold of anti-conversion legal guidelines, the rise of spiritual nationalist vigilante teams, rising mob violence, the “stripping of citizenship rights” by way of the NRC in Assam and CAA, the burning of bibles and assaults on Christians and the concentrating on of Sikhs in the farmers’ protests.

Shannon cited examples of assaults on Christians similar to on February 3, 2019, when a 40-strong mob attacked a church in Karkeli village, close to Raipur main to fifteen worshippers being hospitalised. “Much of the violence against minorities is not appropriately investigated by government authorities,” he stated.
“Powered by the anti-conversion laws and often with the police’s complicity, right-wing groups conduct campaigns of harassment, social exclusion and violence against Christians, Muslims and other religious minorities,” he stated.
Conservative MP Sir Edward Leigh stated: “True friendship requires not turning a blind eye to each other’s faults, and we must protest persecution in India today.”
Minister for Asia Nigel Adams stated: “India faces challenges in enforcing its constitutional protections for freedom of religion or belief. We look to the government of India to address these concerns.”
“In 2004, a Catholic, Sonia Gandhi, facilitated the handover of power to a Sikh, Manmohan Singh, enabling him to become Prime Minister, with his oath of office overseen by a Muslim President, APJ Abdul Kalam,” identified Conservative MP Theresa Villiers.
But not all of the MPs have been comfy with the UK Parliament debating India’s inside issues. The High Commission of India in London had despatched out briefs to these attending to try to deal with any “misinformation” forward of the talk.
Labour MP Barry Gardiner, who was awarded the Padma Shri in January final 12 months, stated he had been inundated with letters from Indian-origin constituents outraged the talk was going forward.
“Imagine the Indian Parliament debating the persecution of Black people in the UK when the Windrush scandal broke. The UK is the former colonial power, whose influence was not entirely beneficent, and certainly not above pitting one religious or ethnic group against the other. People in India might not regard our intervention as either welcome or appropriate,” stated Gardiner.
“I understand the optics of India’s former colonial rulers being seen to lecture them on human rights and democracy. However foreign affairs is still very much a matter reserved to this Parliament,” stated SNP MP David Linden. News Source

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *